Refers to the Hory Kany
discussion.
Hong Kong
Woo. have practically admitted
ment
our ayame
HAL. is
so far concerned, but
suppose if they piens for
f
ascertained
that it
think this
fo
501
but it
Frankr
confee on
uyene we
the ground of can hardly
jub
Cuto
30/5/15
W
refuse
au ma
Раше
I should
like
10
? reple that mr.
H. understood
that the
Corencil
agreed with hemi
that the oin C.
does not confer
power which he
is claiming
exercise,
fan
so conceal ther
no urgenty
matter.
That
Q
to
that
HUS
hould be verified.
Papest this refereme to Jeneral uestion here, lthough it is understand ing considered
andthen
веский
We are No.
Confre
lave
a
seen desizulle
Mi
bringt bring meral question
Anot to afine it to
in the
К.
06.
Vother
Pris
324
general questin
was fully
цеть
discund in usah
(firing the morn
effective parts of
The Com: ) & that re Complaints have been receiverz
from any whi
Crown Celonies to
which
th
*
applies
гладь
That it will he Leen therefore
Thad
no evidence existi
imm
This dept.
then that the funnel
question is
one
of urgency, but
argenes That if the thony
Council
Amy
has reason
To theink Theming
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.